Enforce tool permissions before execution

The Rust CLI/runtime now models permissions as ordered access levels, derives tool requirements from the shared tool specs, and prompts REPL users before one-off danger-full-access escalations from workspace-write sessions. This also wires explicit --permission-mode parsing and makes /permissions operate on the live session state instead of an implicit env-derived default.

Constraint: Must preserve the existing three user-facing modes read-only, workspace-write, and danger-full-access

Constraint: Must avoid new dependencies and keep enforcement inside the existing runtime/tool plumbing

Rejected: Keep the old Allow/Deny/Prompt policy model | could not represent ordered tool requirements across the CLI surface

Rejected: Continue sourcing live session mode solely from RUSTY_CLAUDE_PERMISSION_MODE | /permissions would not reliably reflect the current session state

Confidence: high

Scope-risk: moderate

Reversibility: clean

Directive: Add required_permission entries for new tools before exposing them to the runtime

Tested: cargo fmt; cargo clippy --workspace --all-targets -- -D warnings; cargo test -q

Not-tested: Manual interactive REPL approval flow in a live Anthropic session

rust/crates/runtime/src/permissions.rs

@@ -1,16 +1,29 @@
 use std::collections::BTreeMap;
 
-#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq)]
+#[derive(Debug, Clone, Copy, PartialEq, Eq, PartialOrd, Ord)]
 pub enum PermissionMode {
-    Allow,
-    Deny,
-    Prompt,
+    ReadOnly,
+    WorkspaceWrite,
+    DangerFullAccess,
+}
+
+impl PermissionMode {
+    #[must_use]
+    pub fn as_str(self) -> &'static str {
+        match self {
+            Self::ReadOnly => "read-only",
+            Self::WorkspaceWrite => "workspace-write",
+            Self::DangerFullAccess => "danger-full-access",
+        }
+    }
 }
 
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
 pub struct PermissionRequest {
     pub tool_name: String,
     pub input: String,
+    pub current_mode: PermissionMode,
+    pub required_mode: PermissionMode,
 }
 
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
@@ -31,31 +44,41 @@ pub enum PermissionOutcome {
 
 #[derive(Debug, Clone, PartialEq, Eq)]
 pub struct PermissionPolicy {
-    default_mode: PermissionMode,
-    tool_modes: BTreeMap<String, PermissionMode>,
+    active_mode: PermissionMode,
+    tool_requirements: BTreeMap<String, PermissionMode>,
 }
 
 impl PermissionPolicy {
     #[must_use]
-    pub fn new(default_mode: PermissionMode) -> Self {
+    pub fn new(active_mode: PermissionMode) -> Self {
         Self {
-            default_mode,
-            tool_modes: BTreeMap::new(),
+            active_mode,
+            tool_requirements: BTreeMap::new(),
         }
     }
 
     #[must_use]
-    pub fn with_tool_mode(mut self, tool_name: impl Into<String>, mode: PermissionMode) -> Self {
-        self.tool_modes.insert(tool_name.into(), mode);
+    pub fn with_tool_requirement(
+        mut self,
+        tool_name: impl Into<String>,
+        required_mode: PermissionMode,
+    ) -> Self {
+        self.tool_requirements
+            .insert(tool_name.into(), required_mode);
         self
     }
 
     #[must_use]
-    pub fn mode_for(&self, tool_name: &str) -> PermissionMode {
-        self.tool_modes
+    pub fn active_mode(&self) -> PermissionMode {
+        self.active_mode
+    }
+
+    #[must_use]
+    pub fn required_mode_for(&self, tool_name: &str) -> PermissionMode {
+        self.tool_requirements
             .get(tool_name)
             .copied()
-            .unwrap_or(self.default_mode)
+            .unwrap_or(PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess)
     }
 
     #[must_use]
@@ -65,23 +88,43 @@ impl PermissionPolicy {
         input: &str,
         mut prompter: Option<&mut dyn PermissionPrompter>,
     ) -> PermissionOutcome {
-        match self.mode_for(tool_name) {
-            PermissionMode::Allow => PermissionOutcome::Allow,
-            PermissionMode::Deny => PermissionOutcome::Deny {
-                reason: format!("tool '{tool_name}' denied by permission policy"),
-            },
-            PermissionMode::Prompt => match prompter.as_mut() {
-                Some(prompter) => match prompter.decide(&PermissionRequest {
-                    tool_name: tool_name.to_string(),
-                    input: input.to_string(),
-                }) {
+        let current_mode = self.active_mode();
+        let required_mode = self.required_mode_for(tool_name);
+        if current_mode >= required_mode {
+            return PermissionOutcome::Allow;
+        }
+
+        let request = PermissionRequest {
+            tool_name: tool_name.to_string(),
+            input: input.to_string(),
+            current_mode,
+            required_mode,
+        };
+
+        if current_mode == PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite
+            && required_mode == PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess
+        {
+            return match prompter.as_mut() {
+                Some(prompter) => match prompter.decide(&request) {
                     PermissionPromptDecision::Allow => PermissionOutcome::Allow,
                     PermissionPromptDecision::Deny { reason } => PermissionOutcome::Deny { reason },
                 },
                 None => PermissionOutcome::Deny {
-                    reason: format!("tool '{tool_name}' requires interactive approval"),
+                    reason: format!(
+                        "tool '{tool_name}' requires approval to escalate from {} to {}",
+                        current_mode.as_str(),
+                        required_mode.as_str()
+                    ),
                 },
-            },
+            };
+        }
+
+        PermissionOutcome::Deny {
+            reason: format!(
+                "tool '{tool_name}' requires {} permission; current mode is {}",
+                required_mode.as_str(),
+                current_mode.as_str()
+            ),
         }
     }
 }
@@ -93,25 +136,92 @@ mod tests {
         PermissionPrompter, PermissionRequest,
     };
 
-    struct AllowPrompter;
+    struct RecordingPrompter {
+        seen: Vec<PermissionRequest>,
+        allow: bool,
+    }
 
-    impl PermissionPrompter for AllowPrompter {
+    impl PermissionPrompter for RecordingPrompter {
         fn decide(&mut self, request: &PermissionRequest) -> PermissionPromptDecision {
-            assert_eq!(request.tool_name, "bash");
-            PermissionPromptDecision::Allow
+            self.seen.push(request.clone());
+            if self.allow {
+                PermissionPromptDecision::Allow
+            } else {
+                PermissionPromptDecision::Deny {
+                    reason: "not now".to_string(),
+                }
+            }
         }
     }
 
     #[test]
-    fn uses_tool_specific_overrides() {
-        let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::Deny)
-            .with_tool_mode("bash", PermissionMode::Prompt);
+    fn allows_tools_when_active_mode_meets_requirement() {
+        let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite)
+            .with_tool_requirement("read_file", PermissionMode::ReadOnly)
+            .with_tool_requirement("write_file", PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite);
+
+        assert_eq!(
+            policy.authorize("read_file", "{}", None),
+            PermissionOutcome::Allow
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            policy.authorize("write_file", "{}", None),
+            PermissionOutcome::Allow
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn denies_read_only_escalations_without_prompt() {
+        let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::ReadOnly)
+            .with_tool_requirement("write_file", PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite)
+            .with_tool_requirement("bash", PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess);
 
-        let outcome = policy.authorize("bash", "echo hi", Some(&mut AllowPrompter));
-        assert_eq!(outcome, PermissionOutcome::Allow);
         assert!(matches!(
-            policy.authorize("edit", "x", None),
-            PermissionOutcome::Deny { .. }
+            policy.authorize("write_file", "{}", None),
+            PermissionOutcome::Deny { reason } if reason.contains("requires workspace-write permission")
+        ));
+        assert!(matches!(
+            policy.authorize("bash", "{}", None),
+            PermissionOutcome::Deny { reason } if reason.contains("requires danger-full-access permission")
+        ));
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn prompts_for_workspace_write_to_danger_full_access_escalation() {
+        let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite)
+            .with_tool_requirement("bash", PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess);
+        let mut prompter = RecordingPrompter {
+            seen: Vec::new(),
+            allow: true,
+        };
+
+        let outcome = policy.authorize("bash", "echo hi", Some(&mut prompter));
+
+        assert_eq!(outcome, PermissionOutcome::Allow);
+        assert_eq!(prompter.seen.len(), 1);
+        assert_eq!(prompter.seen[0].tool_name, "bash");
+        assert_eq!(
+            prompter.seen[0].current_mode,
+            PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            prompter.seen[0].required_mode,
+            PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess
+        );
+    }
+
+    #[test]
+    fn honors_prompt_rejection_reason() {
+        let policy = PermissionPolicy::new(PermissionMode::WorkspaceWrite)
+            .with_tool_requirement("bash", PermissionMode::DangerFullAccess);
+        let mut prompter = RecordingPrompter {
+            seen: Vec::new(),
+            allow: false,
+        };
+
+        assert!(matches!(
+            policy.authorize("bash", "echo hi", Some(&mut prompter)),
+            PermissionOutcome::Deny { reason } if reason == "not now"
         ));
     }
 }